Analysis / Property Preservation / Leakage Breakdown

Leakage Breakdown:
Structural Autopsy

$24,048 in margin erosion — mapped by vendor, cause, client, and geography. Small failures that compound into structural loss.

Total Leakage $24,048
Vendor-Caused $16,717
Rework Work Orders 100
QC Rework Cost $24,048
Vendor-Caused Leakage
$16.7K
69.5% of all leakage
Mixed Leakage
$2.6K
10.7% — vendor + client causes
Photos Insufficient
$2.0K
8.4% — documentation failure
Late Submission
$378
1.6% — timing-related loss
Leakage Cause Distribution
$24,048 total leakage broken down by root cause
Leakage by Client
Which client relationships produce the most margin erosion
Vendor Profit Leakage by Cause
Per-contractor breakdown — vendor overrun vs mixed vs other
Vendor Report — Action Required
Ranked by vendor leakage amount with recommended action
ContractorWOsVendor LeakageTotal LeakageAction
SecureOps LLC25$1,055$5,472Immediate Review
Lone Star Fix33$865$4,551Immediate Review
Ohio Property24$595$6,366Immediate Review
Clean Sweep Inc29$330$3,222Immediate Review
Midwest Builders32$330$3,030Renegotiate
GreenThumb Pros32$65$394Preferred Vendor
Coastal Maintain30$50$250Preferred Vendor
Sunshine Cleaning31$30$337Preferred Vendor
Texas Haulers32$30$426Preferred Vendor
Monthly Leakage Trend
When does leakage spike? Pattern identifies operational stress periods
Leakage by Geography — Top ZIP Codes
Invoiced amount by ZIP — concentration reveals regional risk
Vendor Leakage vs Total Leakage per Contractor
Vendor-caused portion (dark) vs total leakage attributed to each contractor's work orders

Failure Has a Shape

Vendor Overrun accounts for $16,717 — 69.5% of all leakage. This is not distributed evenly: SecureOps LLC and Lone Star Fix together generate $1,920 in direct vendor overruns across just 58 work orders, but those same work orders carry $10,023 in total attributed leakage. The pattern is consistent: contractors who overbill on vendor costs correlate with amplified client-side collection failures downstream.

Geography as Friction

ZIP code 33602 (Tampa, FL) accounts for $42,600 in invoiced work — the single largest concentration. Regional density creates approval and documentation pressure that compounds leakage. Distributed operations in Ohio (ZIP 44101) show proportionally lower leakage rates, suggesting that lower-volume regional clusters execute more cleanly than high-density metro markets.

Data source: Project.xlsx Main sheet — 268 work order records, May–December 2025. Leakage classification drawn from Leakage Type column. Vendor leakage = Paid to Contractor minus Expected Contractor Pay. Prepared by Insight Gaps Forensic Data Journalism Bureau.